{"componentChunkName":"component---common-build-tags-template-js","path":"/tag/safety/","result":{"data":{"allArticle":{"edges":[{"node":{"id":"Article_2162-markdown","title":"Marijuana Is Safer Than Alcohol and Tobacco, Study Finds","slug":"marijuana-is-safer-than-alcohol-and-tobacco-study-finds","content":"Over the past 20 years, 23 states and the District of Columbia have\n[legalized marijuana for medical\nuse](https://www.hellomd.com/health-wellness/5596acc23436650006020000/does-medical-marijuana-work).\nDespite these changes to state laws, opponents continue to argue that\nmarijuana causes more harm than good. A [new\nstudy](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311234/) refutes\ntheir claims and shows that marijuana is safer than alcohol and tobacco,\nand researchers and policymakers may have overestimated the risks\nassociated with its use.\n\n**Researchers Use Novel Approach to Compare Mortality Risks**\n\nResearch conducted by Dirk Lachenmeier and Jürgen Rehm, and published in\nScientific Reports in January 2015, investigated the mortality risk\nassociated with seven substances by comparing the lethal dose of each\nsubstance with the typical amount used. This ratio, referred to as the\nmargin of exposure (MOE), was used to determine the risk of dying from\nan overdose of each of the substances.\n\nThe MOE is a novel method for comparing the mortality risk of different\nsubstances. Introduced by the [European Food Safety Authority in\n2005](http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/scientific_output/files/main_documents/282.pdf)\nas an approach for assessing the risk of toxic compounds, it had only\never been used in the addiction field for evaluating substances in\nalcoholic beverages. Previous attempts to compare the dangers of\nsubstances of abuse were based largely on anecdotal, rather than\nscientific, evidence, which meant that policymakers had to rely on\neducated guesses and survey data from developed nations when making\nlegislative decisions. Only in the past decade have researchers begun to\nuse robust scientific techniques to classify the mortality risks of\nparticular substances of abuse. However, many of these approaches were\nbased on expert panel judgments on harm indicators, such as intoxication\nand physical and psychological dependence.\n\n**Evidence for Marijuana's Safety Grows**\n\nLachenmeier and Rehm's research revealed that, of all the substances\nanalyzed, alcohol posed the highest mortality risk at an individual\nlevel, followed by heroin, cocaine, tobacco, ecstasy, methamphetamine\nand marijuana. Alcohol was found to be about 114 times more deadly than\nmarijuana, which was the only substance that was classified as having a\nlow mortality risk. The researchers' classifications were based solely\non the substances themselves and did not take into account environmental\nrisk factors, such as the sharing of contaminated needles by intravenous\ndrug users. Previous studies, including a [comparison of the toxicity of\ncommonly abused\nsubstances](https://rgable.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/toxicity-addiction-offprint2.pdf)\npublished in the journal Addiction in June 2004, ranked marijuana as\nsafer than alcohol and tobacco, but it was not known that the\ndiscrepancy between their mortality risks was this large.\n\n**Researchers Call for Changes to Federal Marijuana Laws**\n\nDespite their known health risks, alcohol and tobacco are exempted from\nthe Controlled Substances Act due to cultural and economic reasons.\nAlcohol and tobacco have been acceptable substances in U.S. culture\nsince well before the repeal of Prohibition in 1933, and they are two of\nthe [most widely used\nsubstances](http://www.samhsa.gov/data/NSDUH/2012SummNatFindDetTables/NationalFindings/NSDUHresults2012.htm)\nnationally. The researchers believe that the risks of alcohol and\ntobacco may have been underestimated in the past, and are urging federal\ngovernment to focus their efforts more on mitigating the harmful effects\nof alcohol and tobacco than on other substances, such as marijuana.\n\nIn contrast, the risks of marijuana may have been overestimated. For the\nmortality endpoint alone, the findings showed marijuana's MOE to be\nabove safety thresholds at the individual and population levels. There\nhas never been a case of a cannabis overdose death. This lends weight to\nthe argument that marijuana should be removed from Schedule I of the\nControlled Substances Act, a category reserved for the most dangerous\nsubstances.\n","image":{"childImageSharp":{"fluid":{"base64":"","aspectRatio":1.4705882352941178,"src":"/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/ee604/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.png","srcSet":"/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/69585/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.png 200w,\n/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/497c6/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.png 400w,\n/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/ee604/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.png 800w,\n/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/74c9e/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.png 955w","srcWebp":"/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/58556/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.webp","srcSetWebp":"/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/61e93/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.webp 200w,\n/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/1f5c5/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.webp 400w,\n/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/58556/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.webp 800w,\n/static/1e6e891ecfc3b981e2b927b710be93ea/3d99a/e07fe2f5dbd6c2648e5d4f794c19fe35.webp 955w","sizes":"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"}}}}},{"node":{"id":"Article_1916-markdown","title":"Study Finds No Link between Teen Cannabis Use and Physical and Mental Health Issues","slug":"study-finds-no-link-between-teen-cannabis-use-and-physical-and-mental-health-issues","content":"Marijuana is one of the most widely used drugs in the United States, and\r\nmany studies have linked chronic use during adolescence to physical and\r\nmental health issues in later life. However, a new\r\n[study](http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/adb-adb0000103.pdf)\r\nhas challenged these findings and suggests that chronic marijuana use by\r\nadolescents is not associated with an increased risk of adverse\r\nlong-term health effects.\r\n\r\nResearch Sheds New Light on Marijuana's Long-Term Effects\r\n---------------------------------------------------------\r\n\r\nResearchers from Rutgers University and the University of Pittsburgh\r\nMedical Center tracked more than 400 males from adolescence into the\r\nmid-30s to review the effects of marijuana over more than two decades.\r\nPublished in the American Psychological Association's journal\r\n\"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors\" in August 2015, the study obtained\r\ndata from the Pittsburgh Youth Study, a long-range project that began in\r\nthe late 1980s as a means to analyze the development of physical, mental\r\nand social problems amongst male public school students.\r\n\r\nThe researchers placed the men into four groups based on self-reported\r\nmarijuana use: low or no marijuana use (46 percent), marijuana use\r\nlimited to adolescence (11 percent), marijuana use commencing in late\r\nadolescence and continuing through adulthood (21 percent) and\r\nearly-onset chronic marijuana use (22 percent). Early-onset chronic\r\nusers reported higher marijuana use, which rapidly increased during\r\nadolescence and peaked at the age of 22, when marijuana was used for\r\nmore than 200 days per year, on average. The men were surveyed every six\r\nmonths for the first 2.5 years and then annually for 10 years until the\r\nage of 26. A follow-up survey was conducted in 2009-2010 when the men\r\nwere 36 years old.\r\n\r\nMarijuana Not a Significant Risk Factor\r\n---------------------------------------\r\n\r\nThe researchers expected to find a link between adolescent marijuana use\r\nand health issues, such as psychotic symptoms, depression, cancer,\r\nasthma or respiratory problems in later life. However, the study\r\nrevealed no significant differences in any of the four groups in terms\r\nof the prevalence of mental or physical health issues in the mid-30s,\r\nirrespective of the amount or frequency of cannabis used. It also\r\nrevealed no differences based on race or ethnicity.\r\n\r\nThe findings suggest that marijuana is more beneficial than harmful and\r\nhelp to discredit claims that marijuana is bad for teens. They lend\r\nweight to the argument that marijuana should be removed from [Schedule I\r\nof the Controlled Substances Act](http://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml),\r\na category reserved for the most dangerous drugs. Marijuana's\r\nclassification as a Schedule I drug has been hotly debated for decades,\r\nwith medical marijuana advocates pointing to the growing body of\r\nevidence demonstrating marijuana's efficacy as a treatment for a variety\r\nof health complaints.\r\n\r\nGiven that each day more than [3,000\r\nteenagers](http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/297780.php) in the\r\nUnited States use marijuana for the first time, a clear understanding of\r\nthe long-term effects of marijuana must be established as more states\r\nconsider moving towards permissiveness. While critics remain concerned\r\nthat the legalization of medical marijuana will lead to a rise in\r\nmarijuana use, especially among teenagers,\r\n[research](http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366%2815%2900217-5/abstract)\r\ncarried out by Columbia University Medical Center in New York and\r\npublished in the journal \"The Lancet\" in June 2015 revealed a decrease\r\nin teen marijuana use in states that have legalized medical marijuana.\r\n\r\n[Photo Credit.](https://www.flickr.com/photos/78122965@N05/7361636130)","image":{"childImageSharp":{"fluid":{"base64":"","aspectRatio":1.5037593984962405,"src":"/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/14b42/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.jpg","srcSet":"/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/f836f/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.jpg 200w,\n/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/2244e/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.jpg 400w,\n/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/14b42/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.jpg 800w,\n/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/7cd0e/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.jpg 922w","srcWebp":"/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/58556/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.webp","srcSetWebp":"/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/61e93/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.webp 200w,\n/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/1f5c5/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.webp 400w,\n/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/58556/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.webp 800w,\n/static/c6f806226fab58a9385916748a50d7cd/88b19/4a46dfdb1b096b8a459968ed65493f7f.webp 922w","sizes":"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"}}}}},{"node":{"id":"Article_1996-markdown","title":"Are there Neurotoxins in your Marijuana?","slug":"are-there-neurotoxins-in-your-marijuana","content":"An interview with Dr. Robert Martin – Co-Founder of CW Analytical Testing Laboratory\r\n\r\n*What does CW Labs do?*\r\n\r\n>We started our lab so that we could: educate patients on the need for testing, provide the clearest, simplest representation of accurate lab test results, and provide dispensaries and growers with the ability to carry out thorough testing on their products at an affordable cost.  Our end goal is to provide the safest possible products to the patient and hopefully, in the process, educate patients as to why testing is important. We, at CW labs, believe there should be more industry regulations that mandate consistent testing by growers and dispensaries. The more quality control required, the better it is for patients and the industry as a whole. Our ultimate goal is to legitimize marijuana through testing and education.\r\n\r\n>Our lab has been designed to mimic labs used in the food industry, an area in which I have been involved for many years. We have our lab set up so that when new product comes through the door, it goes through the same sequential set of tests every time. Consistency in our testing is important for accurate and comparable results for all of our products. My preference for lab design is a horse-shoe pattern: a product enters on one side of the horse-shoe, works its way around the curve, and ends on the other side of the horse-shoe.  I aim to keep the lab quiet, a focused environment is fundamental to decrease possibility of error. We believe in consistency. We are committed to a rigorous scientific process to provide the most accurate results that we are able to. Not all labs or facilities have actual scientists or people trained in the scientific process to run the tests like we do. Tests must be conducted more than once in order to provide corroborated, truly valid results. If we test a product for a bacteria and we find that bacteria, we promptly retest the product to make sure those results are accurate. There are liabilities in running a lab. We want to make sure that we have done our job properly and protected the patient to the best of our ability to prevent patients from illness as much as possible.\r\n\r\n*Who submits their products to testing?*\r\n\r\n>We find that the majority of people who come to us are dispensaries, however, growers do come to us as well. In our experience about 90% of the dispensaries in the East Bay test their products, whereas only about 60% of the dispensaries in San Francisco test their products regularly.\r\n\r\n*Why should a dispensary test?*\r\n\r\n>Patients are often not aware of what might hurt them. Any dispensary that sells medicine should have the patient’s best interest at heart, but often they do not. We regularly see things in the medical marijuana products that would be extremely alarming to many of our patients. For instance, we saw the presence of cholinesterase inhibitors, a neurotoxin, from multiple growers for a 3-4 month span of time. Apparently, a new product was introduced that was intended to kill mites and multiple growers had started to use it. It is only because the product was tested and the toxin was detected that we saw a decline in the use of the pesticide. \r\n\r\n>We have seen a new cycle emerging in this industry: growers use a new un-tested chemical on plants that turns out to be harmful to consumers, when the products are tested by dispensaries these chemicals show up in the results, and then pressure for them to stop using the chemical. The patient and the industry need to put pressure on the dispensary to test all products before they are released, so none of these harmful products fall through the cracks. It is exceptionally irresponsible to subject sick patients to untested, potentially harmful medications. Ethical dispensaries, who test their products regularly, have the ability to transform the growing industry by forcing the growers and producers to clean up their act.\r\n\r\n*What does you lab test for?*\r\n\r\n>We test for cannabinoids, the CBD to THC ratio, pesticides, microbiological material, such as ecoli, terpins, and residuals of any kind and the DNA. We also test for yeast and fungi. Fungal abatement is important. An organic grower may lose about 20% of the crop due to fungus. That said, I believe that organic, outdoor grow operations create a higher quality product with less risk to the patient overall. Additional things that we may test for are growth hormones and Aflatoxins. When we test the bud, we use a randomly selected specimen from each one pound bag. The cost for an average dispensary is around $120 per one pound of bud we test, it adds up to about 28.7 cents per gram for the dispensary, which is affordable.\r\n\r\n>We look for microbiological material and bacteria in products. Typically, the living plant will have none of the bacteria we look for, perhaps due to the amount of terpenoids present. Once the plant is harvested, however, that is when the plant normally starts to collect bacteria. How it is stored and handled greatly effects what is on the cannabis product (i.e. Are gloves used in the harvesting process? Where is the plant put after harvesting? How sterile is the processing area?), often just changing hygiene protocols will yield dramatically better results.\r\n\r\n>We test for 33 of the most commonly used pesticides, as dictated by the EPA. Pesticides are an awful thing to have in medication, they do not break down in your body no matter how you ingest them. Having pesticides in ones body is not good for their health in any way.  Patients should be aware, also, that when concentrates are made from cannabis that have been treated by pesticides, the pesticides are in an extremely concentrated state just like the marijuana.\r\n\r\n>We typically see a 20-30% failure rate from new dispensaries’ products the first time we test them. With in 3-4 months the dispensaries with failures usually return with almost 100% passing products. When the dispensaries understand how their products are harmful, they usually shape up, which is great for the patient.\r\n\r\n*What happens when a product has a negative test result?*\r\n\r\n>We inform dispensaries of their results immediately. If it is a contamination like E.coli we get on the phone right away to inform them of the issue with their product. Dispensaries are responsible to do the right thing when their results are negative, we have no jurisdiction to take personal action. Not all dispensaries will do the right thing by pulling the product off their shelves, but then again there are many dispensaries who will never test to begin with.\r\n\r\n*What misunderstanding do you commonly see?*\r\n\r\n>Many people, including dispensaries, do not understand that lab results do not represent an absolute. There are variables in all tests and results. Absolutes are theoretical and there is variation in just about everything. So, for instance, even in Big Pharma, there is about a 7.5% allowable variation. In the food industry there is about a 20% variance. Here at CW labs we have accomplished about a 10% variance, which compared to the food industry, is really an amazing result to achieve. Another thing people often do not understand is dosages. The medical marijuana industry is based on milligrams, which is often hard for people to get their arms around.\r\n\r\n*What excites you about where CW labs is today?*\r\n\r\n>We want to give back to the patient. Our goal is to educate and help reform an industry that needs stronger regulation, whether that comes from the inside or outside.  Based on the lack of regulation we have witnessed, I helped found an organization called the ACCL (Association of Commercial Cannabis Laboratories), which is dedicated to addressing the lack of regulation in the industry with the hopes of creating the highest standards possible. One thing that we do on a yearly basis is allow for a 3rd party to send independent labs products. We in the ACCL all test these products, then we post our results publicly.  We believe in reliability and accountability and we follow strict guidelines as a whole to work towards achieving those goals.\r\n\r\n>What I have seen as this industry has grown is that there is a new type of cannabis patient. It is a 66 year old woman with chronic pain or a 70+ patient who wants to get off heavy prescription medications. We want to be able to help inform them, allow them to make smart choices, and ultimately provide them with the safest possible medication.\r\n","image":{"childImageSharp":{"fluid":{"base64":"","aspectRatio":1.3333333333333333,"src":"/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/14b42/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.jpg","srcSet":"/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/f836f/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.jpg 200w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/2244e/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.jpg 400w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/14b42/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.jpg 800w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/47498/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.jpg 1200w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/54ac5/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.jpg 1365w","srcWebp":"/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/58556/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.webp","srcSetWebp":"/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/61e93/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.webp 200w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/1f5c5/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.webp 400w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/58556/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.webp 800w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/99238/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.webp 1200w,\n/static/81b66fa7bd264277d71665b5d4503dbc/5e0b8/f8e1c1845b8aefb4a43e27ba2931a3f5.webp 1365w","sizes":"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"}}}}}]}},"pageContext":{"limit":12,"skip":0,"numPages":1,"currentPage":1,"id":5711,"name":"Safety","slug":"safety","country":"US"}},"staticQueryHashes":["3949754563","4179947113","4202924991"]}